Cases for the November 2011 Edition of CaseWatch: Insurance Goldberg Segalla LLP | November 2, 2011 | Agents of America, Goldberg Segalla CaseWatch Insurance | No Comments Cases provided courtesy of LexisNexis. Amco Ins. Co. v. Inspired Technologies, Inc. Ames Constr., Inc. v. Maxum Indem. Co. Aroa Marketing, Inc. v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest Bridge Metal Indus., LLC v. The Travelers Indemnity Co. Citizens Ins. Co. of America. v. Uncommon LLC Cook v. Admiral Ins. Co. Dragas Management Corp. v. Hanover Ins. Co. Employers Reinsurance Co. v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. Feldman Law Group, P.C. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. Fryer v. Omnicom Media Group Gabarick v. Laurin Maritime Inc. et al. Hall v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. Harper Ins. Limited v. Century Indemnity Co. Leprino Foods Co. v. Factory Mut. Ins. Co. Lexington Ins. Co. v. Clearwater Ins. Co. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Pella Corp. Macheca Transp. Co. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co. Markel International Ins. Co. v. Florida West Covered RV & Boat Storage McMillan Construction Services, L.P. v. Arch Specialty Ins. Co. Mosser Construction, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Co. Mu’Min v. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. Munoz v. PHH Corp. Ohio Nat’l Life Assur. Corp. v. Davis Palm Beach Grading, Inc. v. Nautilus Insurance Co. PetroNet LLC v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lincow Suffolk Constr. Co. v. Illinois Union Ins. Co. The Villa Los Alamos Homeowners Assoc. v. State Farm Trailer Bridge, Inc. v. Illinois National Ins. Co. Ward v. United Foundries, Inc. Related Posts Policyholders Not Owed Defense Against Criminal Charges for Rhode Island Nightclub Fire No Comments | May 7, 2012 Proof’s in the Pudding: Sexual Misconduct Exclusions Do Not Preclude Coverage for Defamation Claims, Massachusetts Federal District Court Says No Comments | Nov 29, 2016 Cases for the June 3, 2010 Edition of CaseWatch: Insurance No Comments | Jun 11, 2010 Excess Coverage Means Excess Coverage, Unless it Doesn’t: Texas Court Holds Umbrella Policy is Excess over a Primary Policy that is “Excess by Coincidence” No Comments | Aug 22, 2017 About The Author Goldberg Segalla LLP Add a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment:*Name:* Email Address:* Website: This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.