Policyholder Perspective (Farella Braun + Martel LLP)
Maximizing Business Insurance Coverage Benefits After a Fire By Tyler Gerking, Erica Villanueva & David Smith on September 28, 2020 POSTED IN PROPERTY INSURANCE, RIProperty Insurance Coverage Law Blog (Merlin Law Group)
How Adjusters Should Avoid The Unlicensed Practice of Law By Chip Merlin on December 11, 2020 POSTED IN INSURANCE I am attaching a paper I wrote four years ago, The UPart 5: A Game of “Who’s Who†Under the CCPA
This is our fifth blog post in a multi-part series addressing what insurers need to know about the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). This post focuses on the differences between data collectors,Part 5: A Game of “Who’s Who†Under the CCPA
This is our fifth blog post in a multi-part series addressing what insurers need to know about the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). This post focuses on the differences between data collectors,Part 4: Privacy Policy Requirements Under the CCPA
This is our fourth blog post in a multi-part series addressing what insurers need to know about the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). This post focuses on a business’ obligations when itPart 4: Privacy Policy Requirements Under the CCPA
This is our fourth blog post in a multi-part series addressing what insurers need to know about the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). This post focuses on a business’ obligations when itPart 3: Coverage Considerations Under CGL Policies for CCPA Violations
This blog post is our third in a multi-part series addressing what insurers need to know about the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Imagine this: You own a successful string of sporting goPart 2: Insurance Company Compliance with the CCPA as Businesses
This blog post is our second post in a multi-part series addressing what insurers need to know about the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). This post focuses on insurers’ compliance obligPart 2: Insurance Company Compliance with the CCPA as Businesses
This blog post is our second post in a multi-part series addressing what insurers need to know about the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). This post focuses on insurers’ compliance obligPart 1: The California Consumer Privacy Act — What Insurers Need to Know
Assembly Bill No. 375, better known as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), is likely the most robust and sweeping privacy law in the United States. This is not surprising as California is notPennsylvania Federal Court Reinforces The Principle That Liability Policies Insure Against Legal Obligations Owed To Others
Defense and indemnity obligations owed under liability policies depend on the allegations made in the underlying lawsuit. In NVR, Inc. v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co., 2019 WL 989393 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 201Pennsylvania Courts Continue To Bar To Coverage For Defective Workmanship Claims
Insurance coverage disputes regarding faulty workmanship construction defects are common throughout the United States. In Pennsylvania, under the Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Kvaerner MetalProperty Damage Repairs Prior to Notice of Loss to Insurer Forfeits Coverage
A recent Florida appellate opinion gives more teeth to repercussions for failing to give timely notice of a property damage loss to an insurer. In De la Rosa v. Florida Peninsula Insurance Company, 20Pro Rata v. All Sums: When Viking Pump Applies
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently changed the tune of a decades-old insurance coverage dispute when it decided to apportion liability exposure for multiple instances oPennsylvania Supreme Court Rules that Bad Faith Does Not Require Proof of an Insurer’s Self-Interest or Ill-Will
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled today that the Pennsylvania bad faith statute does not require a plaintiff to prove that an insurer was motivated by self-interest or ill-will when denying benefitPennsylvania Supreme Court Rules that Bad Faith Does Not Require Proof of an Insurer’s Self-Interest or Ill-Will
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled today that the Pennsylvania bad faith statute does not require a plaintiff to prove that an insurer was motivated by self-interest or ill-will when denying benefitPennsylvania Court Rejects Manifestation Trigger for Latent Property Damage Claims
The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania recently determined that the multiple trigger rule, and not the manifestation rule, is the proper standard to use when determining whether an insurance policy isPlain Language, Surplus, and Reasonable Expectations: Utah Supreme Court Uses Entire Contract Construction Toolbox in Concluding Policy Inapplicable to Botched Real Estate Deal
In Compton v. Houston Casualty Co., 2017 UT 17 (Mar. 23, 2017), the Utah Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Houston Casualty Company , holding thaProfessional Services Exclusions Found to Bar Coverage for Insureds’ Administration of Medications Leading to Meningitis Outbreak
In Westfield Insurance Co. v. Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Center of Northern Indiana, Inc. (N.D. Ind. Mar. 28, 2017), an Indiana federal court held an insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify itsMeet The Experts
Review articles and blog posts by our list of insurance experts!
Click Here For Participating Firms
VIEW RATINGS FOR INSURERS
Enter name of Insurance Company and press GO button.